Feature/44 multiple configs #45
Labels
No Label
P0
P1
P2
P3
badger
frostfs-adm
frostfs-cli
frostfs-ir
frostfs-lens
frostfs-node
good first issue
triage
Infrastructure
blocked
bug
config
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
help wanted
internal
invalid
kludge
observability
perfomance
question
refactoring
wontfix
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#45
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch "feature/44-multiple_configs"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may exist for a short time before cleaning up, in most cases it CANNOT be undone. Continue?
close #44
Can we explicitly specify how we resolve conflicts if the same field is present in multiple files?
Please, let's leave example as it is. It's purpose is to demonstrate a possible configuration, not to illustrate this feature. All tests can reside in
pkg/util/config
.Whoops, accidentally committed
I've meant we should clarify and then give an example. Like "if a field is specified in multiple files, the latest occurence takes effect."
Forgot to remove?
No. We have to specify full path to the config field
I've meant a file, speaking about this comment https://github.com/TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node/pull/45#discussion_r1097738834
Oh, you meant all new config files. Ok