TrueCloudLab
/
frostfs-node
18
1
Fork 20
Code Issues 88 Pull Requests 8 Actions Releases Activity

[#574] Check if the container has been really removed from neo-go #624

Merged
fyrchik merged 2 commits from aarifullin/frostfs-node:fix/574-tree_del_info into master 2023-08-21 14:03:36 +00:00
Conversation 0 Commits 2 Files Changed 8
aarifullin commented 2023-08-18 14:23:55 +00:00
Collaborator
  • Add DeletionInfo method support for morph client
  • Use this morph client method in tree service to check if the container has been really removed
* Add DeletionInfo method support for morph client * Use this morph client method in tree service to check if the container has been really removed
aarifullin added the
bug
frostfs-node
 labels 2023-08-18 14:23:55 +00:00
aarifullin reviewed 2023-08-18 14:27:26 +00:00
pkg/services/tree/sync.go Outdated
@ -455,1 +467,3 @@
removed = append(removed, cnr)
existed, err := s.containerEverExisted(cnr)
if err != nil {
aarifullin commented 2023-08-18 14:27:26 +00:00
Poster
Collaborator

@fyrchik
I am not sure that this can be incorrectly ignored (the container cannot be appended to removed list and thus sync will try to sync the container?). Anyway, the netmap cannot be updated until we cannot get info about the container

@fyrchik I am not sure that this can be incorrectly ignored (the container cannot be appended to `removed` list and thus sync will try to sync the container?). Anyway, the netmap cannot be updated until we cannot get info about the container
fyrchik commented 2023-08-21 08:51:38 +00:00
Owner

How is netmap update connected to all this?
It is right, not to remove container in case "unknown" error happens.

How is netmap update connected to all this? It is right, not to remove container in case "unknown" error happens.
aarifullin commented 2023-08-21 09:03:36 +00:00
Poster
Collaborator

How is netmap update connected to all this?

Sorry, nevermind

newMap, cnrsToSync := s.containersToSync(cnrs)

s.syncContainers(ctx, cnrsToSync)

s.removeContainers(ctx, newMap)

I have mistaken newMap for netmap :)

> How is netmap update connected to all this? Sorry, nevermind ```golang newMap, cnrsToSync := s.containersToSync(cnrs) s.syncContainers(ctx, cnrsToSync) s.removeContainers(ctx, newMap) ``` I have mistaken `newMap` for `netmap` :)
aarifullin reviewed 2023-08-18 14:27:29 +00:00
aarifullin reviewed 2023-08-18 14:27:31 +00:00
aarifullin requested review from storage-core-committers 2023-08-18 14:28:03 +00:00
aarifullin requested review from storage-core-developers 2023-08-18 14:28:09 +00:00
aarifullin force-pushed fix/574-tree_del_info from bf5f39dc9a to 27fbce90f7 2023-08-21 07:42:37 +00:00 Compare
aarifullin force-pushed fix/574-tree_del_info from 27fbce90f7 to de6245414f 2023-08-21 07:49:40 +00:00 Compare
aarifullin changed title from Check if the container has been really removed from neo-go to [#574] Check if the container has been really removed from neo-go 2023-08-21 07:51:59 +00:00
dstepanov-yadro approved these changes 2023-08-21 08:00:21 +00:00
fyrchik approved these changes 2023-08-21 08:38:40 +00:00
pkg/services/tree/options.go Outdated
@ -16,1 +16,4 @@
container.Source
// DeletionInfo returns deletion info for the given container in the
// FrostFS network at the moment of a call.
fyrchik commented 2023-08-21 08:06:27 +00:00
Owner

at the moment of a call is somewhat obvious (and, probably, doesn't say what you wanted to). How about to get rid of it?

`at the moment of a call` is somewhat obvious (and, probably, doesn't say what you wanted to). How about to get rid of it?
aarifullin commented 2023-08-21 08:43:28 +00:00
Poster
Collaborator

This was comment for a comment :) Removed

This was comment for a comment :) Removed
fyrchik marked this conversation as resolved
aarifullin force-pushed fix/574-tree_del_info from de6245414f to 14511cae0e 2023-08-21 08:40:51 +00:00 Compare
fyrchik reviewed 2023-08-21 08:41:07 +00:00
pkg/services/tree/sync.go Outdated
@ -443,0 +446,4 @@
if err == nil {
return true, nil
}
if errors.Is(err, &apistatus.ContainerNotFound{}) {
fyrchik commented 2023-08-21 08:41:07 +00:00
Owner

I am not sure Is will work now as expected (compared to As), do we use Is anywhere for status errors?

I am not sure `Is` will work now as expected (compared to `As`), do we use `Is` anywhere for status errors?
fyrchik marked this conversation as resolved
fyrchik reviewed 2023-08-21 08:41:10 +00:00
pkg/services/tree/sync.go Outdated
@ -443,0 +446,4 @@
if err == nil {
return true, nil
}
if errors.Is(err, &apistatus.ContainerNotFound{}) {
fyrchik commented 2023-08-21 08:41:10 +00:00
Owner

I am not sure Is will work now as expected (compared to As), do we use Is anywhere for status errors?

I am not sure `Is` will work now as expected (compared to `As`), do we use `Is` anywhere for status errors?
aarifullin commented 2023-08-21 08:58:50 +00:00
Poster
Collaborator

Sorry, some ideas "mixed" up in my mind.
Fixed to errors.As

Sorry, some [ideas](https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/issues/2465#issuecomment-1661642640) "mixed" up in my mind. Fixed to `errors.As`
fyrchik marked this conversation as resolved
aarifullin force-pushed fix/574-tree_del_info from 14511cae0e to ff04a1f5ad 2023-08-21 08:56:44 +00:00 Compare
aarifullin force-pushed fix/574-tree_del_info from ff04a1f5ad to 23be3eb627 2023-08-21 09:50:49 +00:00 Compare
fyrchik approved these changes 2023-08-21 09:53:06 +00:00
aarifullin requested review from dstepanov-yadro 2023-08-21 13:29:22 +00:00
fyrchik merged commit 23be3eb627 into master 2023-08-21 14:03:36 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
fyrchik
dstepanov-yadro
TrueCloudLab/storage-core-developers
Labels
Clear labels   
P0

Highest   
P1

High   
P2

Medium   
P3

Low   
badger

Badger DB related issues   
frostfs-adm
   
frostfs-cli
   
frostfs-ir
   
frostfs-lens
   
frostfs-node
   
good first issue

Good for newcomers   
triage
  
Infrastructure

Infrastructure, Automation, CI/CD or DevOps related stuff   
blocked

The issue or PR is blocked by something   
bug

Something is not working   
config

Configuration format update or breaking change   
discussion

Talking about something in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas   
documentation

Documentation related   
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists   
enhancement

New feature   
go

Language features adoption   
help wanted

Extra attention is needed   
internal
   
invalid

Something is wrong   
kludge

This is a kludge and we know it   
observability

Related to metrics, tracing and logs   
perfomance

Perfomance related   
question

More information is needed   
refactoring

Refactoring   
wontfix

This won't be fixed
No Label
P0
P1
P2
P3
badger
frostfs-adm
frostfs-cli
frostfs-ir
frostfs-lens
frostfs-node
good first issue
triage
Infrastructure
blocked
bug
config
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
help wanted
internal
invalid
kludge
observability
perfomance
question
refactoring
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#624
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch "aarifullin/frostfs-node:fix/574-tree_del_info"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may exist for a short time before cleaning up, in most cases it CANNOT be undone. Continue?