TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node
21
1
Fork 27
Code Issues 104 Pull requests 4 Projects Releases 2 Activity Actions

Use bytes in control service proto definition for chainID #885

Merged
fyrchik merged 2 commits from dkirillov/frostfs-node:feature/control_api_make_chain_id_bytes into master 2024-01-11 07:24:27 +00:00
Conversation 0 Commits 2 Files changed 10 +45 -12
dkirillov commented 2023-12-21 13:03:33 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  • Make chainID as bytes in grpc proto (in control service)
  • Support providing chainID in hex format in frostfs-cli
* Make chainID as bytes in grpc proto (in control service) * Support providing chainID in hex format in `frostfs-cli`
dkirillov force-pushed feature/control_api_make_chain_id_bytes from e88f7a009b to bd70ea3d17 2023-12-21 13:05:07 +00:00 Compare
dkirillov changed title from WIP: feature/control_api_make_chain_id_bytes to feature/control_api_make_chain_id_bytes 2023-12-21 13:05:40 +00:00
dkirillov requested review from storage-core-committers 2023-12-21 13:05:45 +00:00
dkirillov requested review from storage-core-developers 2023-12-21 13:05:46 +00:00
dstepanov-yadro reviewed 2023-12-21 15:46:55 +00:00
cmd/frostfs-cli/modules/control/get_rule.go Outdated
@ -33,1 +34,4 @@
chainID, _ := cmd.Flags().GetString(chainIDFlag)
hexEncoded, _ := cmd.Flags().GetBool(chainIDHexFlag)
if hexEncoded {
dstepanov-yadro commented 2023-12-21 15:46:44 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Is chain ID user-defined string? If so, then hex looks redundant

Is chain ID user-defined string? If so, then hex looks redundant
dkirillov commented 2023-12-22 06:18:09 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Yes, it's can be user-defined. But in case when we add local overrides from IAM service ids can be not-printable so we need some way to provide such id using frostfs-cli

Yes, it's can be user-defined. But in case when we add local overrides from IAM service ids can be not-printable so we need some way to provide such id using `frostfs-cli`
dstepanov-yadro marked this conversation as resolved
dstepanov-yadro approved these changes 2023-12-22 07:31:23 +00:00
fyrchik reviewed 2023-12-22 10:50:41 +00:00
cmd/frostfs-cli/modules/control/list_rules.go Outdated
@ -64,3 +64,3 @@
var chain apechain.Chain
commonCmd.ExitOnErr(cmd, "decode error: %w", chain.DecodeBytes(c))
cmd.Println("Parsed chain:\n" + prettyJSONFormat(cmd, chain.Bytes()))
cmd.Printf("Parsed chain (chain id hex: '%x'):\n%s\n", chain.ID, prettyJSONFormat(cmd, chain.Bytes()))
fyrchik commented 2023-12-22 10:49:22 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Can we use utf8.IsValid and do not output string on false?

Can we use `utf8.IsValid` and do not output string on false?
dkirillov commented 2023-12-22 12:39:08 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Do you mean not output json chain or which one string?

Do you mean not output json chain or which one string?
fyrchik commented 2023-12-22 12:49:15 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Oh, sorry, thought it was a name.

Oh, sorry, thought it was a name.
fyrchik marked this conversation as resolved
cmd/frostfs-cli/modules/control/remove_rule.go Outdated
@ -15,2 +16,3 @@
const (
chainIDFlag = "chain-id"
chainIDFlag = "chain-id"
chainIDHexFlag = "chain-id-hex"
fyrchik commented 2023-12-22 10:49:58 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Hex is not needed for cli, cli is for user.

Hex is not needed for cli, cli is for user.
dkirillov commented 2023-12-22 12:24:20 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Yes, but we can set overrides via IAM #885 (comment)

Yes, but we can set overrides via IAM https://git.frostfs.info/TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node/pulls/885#issuecomment-29780
fyrchik commented 2023-12-22 12:49:59 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

We need this in control service, but hex-encoding is a purely CLI thing.

We need this in control service, but hex-encoding is a purely CLI thing.
dkirillov commented 2023-12-22 12:58:31 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Let's consider the use-case:

  1. Someone (e.g. IAM) set non-utf8 id
  2. User using cli lists all policies and see policy from step 1
  3. User want to delete/get policy from step 1. He needs somehow pass non-utf8 id via CLI

If this isn't a case, I can keep only this commit

Let's consider the use-case: 1. Someone (e.g. IAM) set non-utf8 id 2. User using cli lists all policies and see policy from step 1 3. User want to delete/get policy from step 1. He needs somehow pass non-utf8 id via CLI If this isn't a case, I can keep only [this commit](https://git.frostfs.info/TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node/commit/2a1d79a37dc45c723c9edf49d2ee46084d10f5fb)
fyrchik commented 2023-12-22 19:22:43 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Control service lists only local overrides, IAM uses contract.

Control service lists only local overrides, IAM uses contract.
dkirillov commented 2024-01-09 06:44:09 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

IAM uses not only contract. It sets local overrides in s3/node too

IAM uses not only contract. It sets local overrides in s3/node too
👍 1
pkg/services/control/service.proto Outdated
@ -507,3 +507,3 @@
// Chain ID assigned for the added rule chain.
string chain_id = 2;
bytes chain_id = 2;
fyrchik commented 2023-12-22 10:50:30 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

If we agree to use hash of the serialized chain as the key in contract, do we need this?

If we agree to use hash of the serialized chain as the key in contract, do we need this?
dkirillov commented 2023-12-22 12:23:03 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

No, we don't need this. But then I would renane chain_id to something else? Probably even here

No, we don't need this. But then I would renane `chain_id` to something else? Probably even [here](https://git.frostfs.info/TrueCloudLab/policy-engine/src/commit/ed93bb5cc57465c1b9b5caa4c8e3b62cdf5357e1/pkg/chain/chain.go#L14)
dkirillov force-pushed feature/control_api_make_chain_id_bytes from bd70ea3d17 to c1cbab092e 2024-01-09 08:22:59 +00:00 Compare
acid-ant approved these changes 2024-01-09 11:22:25 +00:00
fyrchik approved these changes 2024-01-10 08:26:32 +00:00
fyrchik removed review request for storage-core-developers 2024-01-10 08:26:37 +00:00
fyrchik requested review from storage-core-developers 2024-01-10 08:26:55 +00:00
aarifullin approved these changes 2024-01-10 08:29:38 +00:00
fyrchik changed title from feature/control_api_make_chain_id_bytes to Use bytes in control service proto definition for chainID 2024-01-10 08:35:44 +00:00
fyrchik added the
frostfs-cli
frostfs-node
 labels 2024-01-10 08:35:59 +00:00
dkirillov force-pushed feature/control_api_make_chain_id_bytes from c1cbab092e to 474aff315c 2024-01-11 06:36:44 +00:00 Compare
fyrchik approved these changes 2024-01-11 07:24:13 +00:00
fyrchik merged commit 4a4c790ec1 into master 2024-01-11 07:24:27 +00:00
dkirillov deleted branch feature/control_api_make_chain_id_bytes 2024-01-11 07:30:20 +00:00
fyrchik referenced this pull request from a commit 2024-01-12 15:38:43 +00:00
[#885] go.mod: Update APE
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
dstepanov-yadro
acid-ant
aarifullin
fyrchik
Labels
Clear labels   
P0

Highest

  
P1

High

  
P2

Medium

  
P3

Low

  
badger

Badger DB related issues

  
frostfs-adm

   
frostfs-cli

   
frostfs-ir

   
frostfs-lens

   
frostfs-node

   
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
triage
  
Infrastructure

Infrastructure, Automation, CI/CD or DevOps related stuff

  
blocked

The issue or PR is blocked by something

  
bug

Something is not working

  
config

Configuration format update or breaking change

  
discussion

Talking about something in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas

  
documentation

Documentation related

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
go

Language features adoption

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
internal

   
invalid

Something is wrong

  
kludge

This is a kludge and we know it

  
observability

Related to metrics, tracing and logs

  
perfomance

Perfomance related

  
question

More information is needed

  
refactoring

Refactoring

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No labels
P0
P1
P2
P3
badger
frostfs-adm
frostfs-cli
frostfs-ir
frostfs-lens
frostfs-node
good first issue
triage
Infrastructure
blocked
bug
config
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
help wanted
internal
invalid
kludge
observability
perfomance
question
refactoring
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#885
No description provided.
Delete branch "dkirillov/frostfs-node:feature/control_api_make_chain_id_bytes"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?