[#577] Update SDK to support new tree/pool version #577
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
P0
P1
P2
P3
good first issue
Infrastructure
blocked
bug
config
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
help wanted
internal
invalid
kludge
observability
perfomance
question
refactoring
wontfix
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: TrueCloudLab/frostfs-s3-gw#577
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "mbiryukova/frostfs-s3-gw:feature/update_sdk"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Signed-off-by: Marina Biryukova m.biryukova@yadro.com
8c362d8c0e
toaacace4bba
WIP: [#xxx] Update SDK to support new tree/pool versionto WIP: [#577] Update SDK to support new tree/pool versionaacace4bba
todd96708a9d
dd96708a9d
to22c290fec4
@ -688,12 +688,14 @@ features:
deny_by_default: false
md5:
enabled: false
tree_pool_v2: true
Let's use something more self-explained, e.g.
tree_pool_netmap_support: true
or something like this.@ -0,0 +52,4 @@
prm.SessionToken = bd.Gate.SessionToken()
}
res, err := n.frostFS.Container(ctx, prm)
By the way, it would be very interesting to find out amount of cache misses during S3 load. Maybe we can prepare some custom build and make some load tests to see, if cache misses ever happen or not.
@ -0,0 +56,4 @@
if err != nil {
return netmap.PlacementPolicy{}, fmt.Errorf("get container: %w", err)
}
22c290fec4
to125a341d27
125a341d27
to18e0db4b4b
18e0db4b4b
to14162d8911
WIP: [#577] Update SDK to support new tree/pool versionto [#577] Update SDK to support new tree/pool version14162d8911
tofe1ac463d0
@ -450,3 +450,3 @@
lifetime: 1m
size: 10000
network_info:
network:
Is it ok to change old params just in one release?
@alexvanin
Yeah, let's not do that, I suppose. That's not a great naming but it's better than breaking compaitbility.
@ -0,0 +65,4 @@
return c.cache.Set(networkInfoKey, info)
}
func (c *NetworkCache) GetNetMap() *netmap.NetMap {
Can we write
Netmap
rather thanNetMap
? It seems in storage node there was a discussion on this topicfe1ac463d0
to95d847d611
New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings