TrueCloudLab/frostfs-sdk-go
32
0
Fork 21
Code Issues 34 Pull requests 2 Releases Activity Actions

[#237] pool: Return creation epoch from object put #237

Merged
alexvanin merged 1 commit from mbiryukova/frostfs-sdk-go:feature/epoch_from_object_put into master 2024-07-22 06:15:26 +00:00
Conversation 0 Commits 1 Files changed 9 +65 -27
mbiryukova commented 2024-07-12 11:51:14 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Signed-off-by: Marina Biryukova m.biryukova@yadro.com

Signed-off-by: Marina Biryukova <m.biryukova@yadro.com>
mbiryukova self-assigned this 2024-07-12 11:51:14 +00:00
mbiryukova added 1 commit 2024-07-12 11:51:16 +00:00
[#xxx] pool: Return creation epoch from object put
Some checks failed
DCO / DCO (pull_request) Failing after 1m22s
Details
Tests and linters / Tests (1.21) (pull_request) Successful in 2m15s
Details
Tests and linters / Tests (1.20) (pull_request) Successful in 2m28s
Details
Tests and linters / Lint (pull_request) Successful in 5m35s
Details
8d764f37aa 
Signed-off-by: Marina Biryukova <m.biryukova@yadro.com>
mbiryukova force-pushed feature/epoch_from_object_put from 8d764f37aa to 0858160c88 2024-07-12 11:51:52 +00:00 Compare
mbiryukova changed title from [#xxx] pool: Return creation epoch from object put to [#237] pool: Return creation epoch from object put 2024-07-12 11:52:27 +00:00
mbiryukova requested review from storage-core-committers 2024-07-12 12:06:03 +00:00
mbiryukova requested review from storage-core-developers 2024-07-12 12:06:03 +00:00
mbiryukova requested review from storage-sdk-committers 2024-07-12 12:06:04 +00:00
mbiryukova requested review from storage-sdk-developers 2024-07-12 12:06:06 +00:00
mbiryukova requested review from storage-services-committers 2024-07-12 12:06:07 +00:00
mbiryukova requested review from storage-services-developers 2024-07-12 12:06:09 +00:00
fyrchik approved these changes 2024-07-12 12:49:12 +00:00
achuprov approved these changes 2024-07-12 14:08:56 +00:00
dkirillov reviewed 2024-07-15 06:29:35 +00:00
client/object_put.go Outdated
@ -80,6 +81,10 @@ func (x ResObjectPut) StoredObjectID() oid.ID {
return x.obj
}
func (x ResObjectPut) StoredEpoch() uint64 {
dkirillov commented 2024-07-15 06:24:27 +00:00
Member
Copy link

We need comment I suppose (to be consistent with other methods)

We need comment I suppose (to be consistent with other methods)
dkirillov marked this conversation as resolved
client/object_put_single.go Outdated
@ -96,0 +97,4 @@
epoch uint64
}
func (r *ResObjectPutSingle) Epoch() uint64 {
dkirillov commented 2024-07-15 06:24:53 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Also need comment

Also need comment
dkirillov marked this conversation as resolved
pool/pool.go Outdated
@ -2449,3 +2449,3 @@
//
// Main return value MUST NOT be processed on an erroneous return.
func (p *Pool) PutObject(ctx context.Context, prm PrmObjectPut) (oid.ID, error) {
func (p *Pool) PutObject(ctx context.Context, prm PrmObjectPut) (oid.ID, uint64, error) {
dkirillov commented 2024-07-15 06:29:09 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Let's introduce new struct that contains both id and epoch rather than return these values individually

Let's introduce new struct that contains both id and epoch rather than return these values individually
dkirillov marked this conversation as resolved
mbiryukova force-pushed feature/epoch_from_object_put from 0858160c88 to 249f76cfe8 2024-07-15 09:33:57 +00:00 Compare
aarifullin approved these changes 2024-07-15 10:16:32 +00:00
aarifullin left a comment
Member
Copy link

OK with me

OK with me
alexvanin approved these changes 2024-07-15 11:58:40 +00:00
dkirillov reviewed 2024-07-15 13:28:16 +00:00
dkirillov reviewed 2024-07-15 13:28:51 +00:00
pool/pool.go Outdated
@ -2460,2 +2472,3 @@
var ctxCall callContext
var (
res ResPutObject
dkirillov commented 2024-07-15 13:28:51 +00:00
Member
Copy link

(non-blocking): Can we don't introduce this variable?

I suggest:

diff --git a/pool/pool.go b/pool/pool.go
index 6e435a1..651702b 100644
--- a/pool/pool.go
+++ b/pool/pool.go
@@ -2470,19 +2470,16 @@ func (p *Pool) PutObject(ctx context.Context, prm PrmObjectPut) (ResPutObject, e
 
 	p.fillAppropriateKey(&prm.prmCommon)
 
-	var (
-		res     ResPutObject
-		ctxCall callContext
-	)
+	var ctxCall callContext
 	ctxCall.sessionClientCut = prm.clientCut
 	if err := p.initCallContext(&ctxCall, prm.prmCommon, prmCtx); err != nil {
-		return res, fmt.Errorf("init call context: %w", err)
+		return ResPutObject{}, fmt.Errorf("init call context: %w", err)
 	}
 
 	if ctxCall.sessionDefault {
 		ctxCall.sessionTarget = prm.UseSession
 		if err := p.openDefaultSession(ctx, &ctxCall); err != nil {
-			return res, fmt.Errorf("open default session: %w", err)
+			return ResPutObject{}, fmt.Errorf("open default session: %w", err)
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -2493,12 +2490,11 @@ func (p *Pool) PutObject(ctx context.Context, prm PrmObjectPut) (ResPutObject, e
 		prm.setNetworkInfo(ni)
 	}
 
-	var err error
-	res, err = ctxCall.client.objectPut(ctx, prm)
+	res, err := ctxCall.client.objectPut(ctx, prm)
 	if err != nil {
 		// removes session token from cache in case of token error
 		p.checkSessionTokenErr(err, ctxCall.endpoint)
-		return res, fmt.Errorf("init writing on API client %s: %w", ctxCall.endpoint, err)
+		return ResPutObject{}, fmt.Errorf("init writing on API client %s: %w", ctxCall.endpoint, err)
 	}
 
 	return res, nil
(non-blocking): Can we don't introduce this variable? I suggest: ```diff diff --git a/pool/pool.go b/pool/pool.go index 6e435a1..651702b 100644 --- a/pool/pool.go +++ b/pool/pool.go @@ -2470,19 +2470,16 @@ func (p *Pool) PutObject(ctx context.Context, prm PrmObjectPut) (ResPutObject, e p.fillAppropriateKey(&prm.prmCommon) - var ( - res ResPutObject - ctxCall callContext - ) + var ctxCall callContext ctxCall.sessionClientCut = prm.clientCut if err := p.initCallContext(&ctxCall, prm.prmCommon, prmCtx); err != nil { - return res, fmt.Errorf("init call context: %w", err) + return ResPutObject{}, fmt.Errorf("init call context: %w", err) } if ctxCall.sessionDefault { ctxCall.sessionTarget = prm.UseSession if err := p.openDefaultSession(ctx, &ctxCall); err != nil { - return res, fmt.Errorf("open default session: %w", err) + return ResPutObject{}, fmt.Errorf("open default session: %w", err) } } @@ -2493,12 +2490,11 @@ func (p *Pool) PutObject(ctx context.Context, prm PrmObjectPut) (ResPutObject, e prm.setNetworkInfo(ni) } - var err error - res, err = ctxCall.client.objectPut(ctx, prm) + res, err := ctxCall.client.objectPut(ctx, prm) if err != nil { // removes session token from cache in case of token error p.checkSessionTokenErr(err, ctxCall.endpoint) - return res, fmt.Errorf("init writing on API client %s: %w", ctxCall.endpoint, err) + return ResPutObject{}, fmt.Errorf("init writing on API client %s: %w", ctxCall.endpoint, err) } return res, nil ```
dkirillov approved these changes 2024-07-15 13:28:57 +00:00
mbiryukova force-pushed feature/epoch_from_object_put from 249f76cfe8 to 2c2bcfc834 2024-07-15 14:52:41 +00:00 Compare
alexvanin merged commit 7e94a6adf2 into master 2024-07-22 06:15:26 +00:00
alexvanin deleted branch feature/epoch_from_object_put 2024-07-22 06:15:29 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
fyrchik
achuprov
aarifullin
alexvanin
dkirillov
TrueCloudLab/storage-sdk-developers
TrueCloudLab/storage-services-developers
Labels
Clear labels   
P0

Highest

  
P1

High

  
P2

Medium

  
P3

Low

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
pool

Tasks related to client pool

  
Infrastructure

Infrastructure, Automation, CI/CD or DevOps related stuff

  
blocked

The issue or PR is blocked by something

  
bug

Something is not working

  
config

Configuration format update or breaking change

  
discussion

Talking about something in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas

  
documentation

Documentation related

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
go

Language features adoption

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
internal

   
invalid

Something is wrong

  
kludge

This is a kludge and we know it

  
observability

Related to metrics, tracing and logs

  
perfomance

Perfomance related

  
question

More information is needed

  
refactoring

Refactoring

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No labels
P0
P1
P2
P3
good first issue
pool
Infrastructure
blocked
bug
config
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
help wanted
internal
invalid
kludge
observability
perfomance
question
refactoring
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
mbiryukova
6 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: TrueCloudLab/frostfs-sdk-go#237
No description provided.
Delete branch "mbiryukova/frostfs-sdk-go:feature/epoch_from_object_put"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?