docs: Introduce APE overview #71

Merged
fyrchik merged 1 commit from aarifullin/policy-engine:feat/docs_ape into master 2024-05-13 16:37:46 +00:00
5 changed files with 323 additions and 0 deletions

85
docs/ape.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
# Access policy engine
## General overview
### Purpose
Access policy engine (APE) is aimed at checking if a request can be performed over a resource by looking up the set chains of rules.
#### Terms
| Term | Description | Structure overview |
| -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------- |
| `Request` | The action that is being performed on the `Resource`. | <ul><li>`Operation` - `GetObject`,`PutObject` etc.;</li><li>`Properties` - actor's public key, actor's attributes;</li><li>`Resource`.</li></ul> |
| `Resource` | The object that the request is being performed on. Check also [resource.md](./resource.md). | <ul><li>`Name` - strictly formatted string value;</li><li>`Properties`.</li></ul> |
| `Chain` | A chain of `Rule`-s defined for a specific target. Chains are strictly distinguished by `Name`-s , i.e. chains with name `ingress` are not intersected with chains with name `s3`. Chains are stored in serialized format. | <ul><li>Base64-encoded `ID`;</li><li>List of `Rule`-s;</li><li>`MatchType` - defines rule status selection priority.</li></ul> |
| `Rule` | `Rule` defines which status is returned if `Request` matches all conditions. | <ul><li>`Status`: `Allow`, `AccessDenied`, `QuotaLimitReached`, `NoRuleFound`;</li><li>`Actions` - operation defined by a schema (`GetObject`, `PutContainer` etc.);</li><li>`Resources`;</li><li>`Any` - if `true` then `Reqeust` matches `Rule` if any `Condition` is `true`;</li><li>`Conditions`.</li></ul> |
| `Name` | `Name` of a chain (do not confuse with chain ID). `Name` defines a layer of `Chain`'s usage, so chains are distinguished by `Name`-s. Basically, `Name` refers to a protocol. | String value (`ingress`, `s3`, `iam`). |
| `Target` | A scope of request. `Target` can be either simple (only namespace; only container; only user; only groups) or compound (namespace + container). | <ul><li>`Namespace`;</li><li>`Container`;</li><li>`User`;</li><li>`Groups`.</li></ul> |
| `Engine` | `Engine` checks a request in a scope defined by `Target`. First, it is trying to match a request with rules defined in `LocalOverrideStorage` and, then, in `MorphRuleChainStorage`. | <ul><li>`LocalOverrideStorage` - chains stored in the local override storage have the highest priority</li><li>`MorphRuleChainStorage` - basically, chains stored in `Policy` contract;</li><li>`ChainRouter` - looks up chains and try to match them with `Request`.</li></ul> |
#### Details
Here some entities are overviewed in more detail.
##### Resource
`Resource`'s name is strictly formatted, the format is defined by a schema (`native`, `aws` etc.). Examples:
```bash
# The resource is the particular object with the address within Root namespace
native:object//HRwWbb1bJjRms33kkA21hy4JdPfARaH3fW9NfuNN6Fgj/EbxzAdz5LB4uqxuz6crWKAumBNtZyK2rKsqQP7TdZvwr
# The resource is all objects within the container within Root namespace
native:object//HRwWbb1bJjRms33kkA21hy4JdPfARaH3fW9NfuNN6Fgj/*
# The resource is the particular container within the namespace
native:container/namespace1/HRwWbb1bJjRms33kkA21hy4JdPfARaH3fW9NfuNN6Fgj
# The resource is all containers within the namespace
native:container/namespace1/*
```
##### Rule
`Rule` works out if:
1. a requests's operation matches the rule's `Actions`;
2. resource name matches the rule's `Resources`;
3. if all (or at least one if `Any=true`) conditions in `Condition` is met. Each condition defines how to retrieve
and compare the retrieved value. If `Condition`'s `Object` is set to `Resource` then the value is retrieved from the
resource's properties (example: container zone attribute). If `Object` is set to `Request`, the it's retrieved from the request's properties (example: actor's public key).
###### Name matching
`Resource`'s name in `Rule` may contain wildcard '*' that can be considered as a regular expression:
```bash
# The resource is all objects within the container within Root namespace
native:object//HRwWbb1bJjRms33kkA21hy4JdPfARaH3fW9NfuNN6Fgj/*
```
If an incoming request has such a resource name, then names are matched:
```bash
# The resource is all objects within the container within Root namespace
native:object//HRwWbb1bJjRms33kkA21hy4JdPfARaH3fW9NfuNN6Fgj/EbxzAdz5LB4uqxuz6crWKAumBNtZyK2rKsqQP7TdZvwr
```
If the incoming request has such a resource name that specifies a container's object within namespace, for instance, `namespicy`,
then matching does not work out:
```bash
# The resource is all objects within the container within `namespicy` namespace:
native:object/namespicy/HRwWbb1bJjRms33kkA21hy4JdPfARaH3fW9NfuNN6Fgj/EbxzAdz5LB4uqxuz6crWKAumBNtZyK2rKsqQP7TdZvwr
```
##### Engine
`Engine` is trying to match the request against **the target** looking up chain rules, firstly, in `LocalOverrideStorage` (these rules are also known as *local overrides*) and then in `MorphRuleChainStorage` (contract `Policy`). Both storages iterate chain rules according to the specified priority of the targets: `namespace` -> `container` -> `user` -> `groups`.
#### Diagrams
The diagram demonstrates a scenario in Storage node. The request `A` cannot be performed as APE matched
the request and returned `Access Denied` status. The request `B` is allowed and the client gets `OK` status.
![Storage node](images/ape/storage_node_ape.svg)
The diagram demonstrates a complex scenario with S3, IAM and Storage node.
![S3 and IAM](images/ape/s3_ape.svg)

View file

@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
@startuml s3 ape
participant "Client" as client
participant "IAM" as iam
participant "IAM -> APE converter" as converter
box "S3" #HotPink
participant "S3 gateway" as s3
end box
box "Access Policy Engine (as s3 middleware)" #LightPink
participant "Local override storage" as s3localOverrides
participant "Chain router" as s3chainRouter
end box
box "Policy contract (shared)"
participant "Morph rule storage" as morphRuleStorage
end box
box "Access Policy Engine (as storage middleware)" #LightGreen
participant "Chain Router" as storageChainRouter
participant "Local override storage" as storageLocalOverrides
end box
box "Storage node" #Green
participant "Object service" as obj
participant "Control service" as control
end box
group Request IAM to set a policy
client -> iam : Set IAM policy
iam -> converter : Convert IAM policy
converter -> iam : Return APE chain
iam -> morphRuleStorage : Store IAM policy and APE chain
iam -> s3localOverrides : Set S3 local overrides
iam -> client : OK
end
group Request S3 to set a policy
client -> s3 : Set bucket policy
s3 -> converter : Convert IAM policy
converter -> s3 : Return APE chain
s3 -> morphRuleStorage : Store bucket policy and APE chain
s3 -> client : OK
end
group Get object
client -> s3: GetObject
s3 -> s3chainRouter: Check if APE allows request for S3
note over s3chainRouter: matching the request with overrides and rules
s3chainRouter -> s3: Status: ALLOW
s3 -> obj: Get object
obj -> storageChainRouter: Check if APE allows the request
note over storageChainRouter : matching the request with overrides and rules
storageChainRouter -> obj: Status: ALLOW
obj -> s3: Response: OK, Object
s3 -> client: Response: OK, Object
end
@enduml

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 22 KiB

View file

@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
@startuml storage node ape
!pragma teoz true
participant "Administrator" as administrator
participant "Client" as client
box "Storage node" #Green
participant "Object service" as obj
participant "Control service" as control
end box
box "Access Policy Engine" #LightGreen
participant "Local override storage" as localOverrides
participant "Chain Router" as chainRouter
participant "Morph rule storage" as morphRuleStorage
end box
group Set local override
client -> control: Add local override
control -> localOverrides: Save override in DB
localOverrides -> control: OK
control -> client: OK
end
group Update state in Policy contract
administrator -> morphRuleStorage: Add chain
morphRuleStorage -> administrator: OK
end
group Perform a request A
client -> obj : Sending a request
obj -> chainRouter: Check if APE allows the request
note over chainRouter : Fetches local overrides and rules defined for a target/targets and looks for a match
chainRouter -> obj: APE returns status: "ACCESS DENIED"
obj -> client: Response: "the request is denied"
end
group Perform a request B
client -> obj : Sending a request
obj -> chainRouter: Check if APE allows the request
note over chainRouter : Fetches local overrides and rules defined for a target/targets and looks for a match
chainRouter -> obj: APE returns status: "ALLOW"
obj -> client: Response: "OK"
end
@enduml

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 17 KiB