ale64bit

0 followers · 0 following

• Joined on 2023-03-06
• • 

Repositories

7

Projects Packages Code Public activity Starred repositories

ale64bit created pull request TrueCloudLab/xk6-frostfs#35 2023-03-16 09:45:24 +00:00

[#14]: Add local target support

ale64bit pushed to feature/14-local_targets at ale64bit/xk6-frostfs 2023-03-16 09:41:36 +00:00

30a61f8e2e [#14]: Add local target support

ale64bit created branch feature/14-local_targets in ale64bit/xk6-frostfs 2023-03-16 09:39:19 +00:00

ale64bit pushed to feature/14-local_targets at ale64bit/xk6-frostfs 2023-03-16 09:39:19 +00:00

401153cc80 [#14]: Add local target support

ale64bit deleted branch fix/81-substorage_benchmark from ale64bit/frostfs-node 2023-03-16 06:53:05 +00:00

ale64bit commented on pull request TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#84 2023-03-15 07:07:43 +00:00

[#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages

I removed the sequential test for write benchmark, but the generator is still used (it's useful for example, when you want to fill an instance and execute a workload where you want to control the…

ale64bit created repository ale64bit/xk6-frostfs 2023-03-14 10:01:15 +00:00

ale64bit commented on pull request TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#84 2023-03-14 09:37:56 +00:00

[#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages

I'm not sure what kind of problem you have in mind. Can you elaborate? (mu is held during Get).

ale64bit commented on pull request TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#84 2023-03-14 09:37:20 +00:00

[#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages

done

ale64bit commented on pull request TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#84 2023-03-14 09:37:15 +00:00

[#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages

I guess they aren't. Fixed.

ale64bit pushed to fix/81-substorage_benchmark at ale64bit/frostfs-node 2023-03-14 09:37:11 +00:00

c7d231f064 [#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages

ale64bit commented on pull request TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#84 2023-03-14 07:05:41 +00:00

[#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages

nope. I guess from go mod tidy. Maybe it was only indirect before.

ale64bit pushed to fix/81-substorage_benchmark at ale64bit/frostfs-node 2023-03-13 10:00:02 +00:00

1b58f60772 [#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages

365adb4ebd [#133] .github: Restore logo.svg

bce5827f64 [#83] pre-commit: Add shellcheck hook

05471d3827 [#83] util/autocomplete: Fix deprecated warning

8226d49376 [#83] pre-commit: Add gitlint hook

Compare 16 commits »

ale64bit commented on pull request TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#84 2023-03-07 10:51:46 +00:00

[#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages

done

ale64bit commented on pull request TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#84 2023-03-07 10:51:40 +00:00

[#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages

True, but having the sequential benchmark can provide a hint to whether the substorage should do something about the sequentiality of the keys in case sequential writes happen to be beneficial for…

ale64bit commented on pull request TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#84 2023-03-07 10:49:16 +00:00

[#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages

done. Can we force it to be constructed properly then? (maybe hide it under an interface and have a New function that ensures those things are actually set or return an error).

ale64bit commented on pull request TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#84 2023-03-07 10:47:58 +00:00

[#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages

done

ale64bit pushed to fix/81-substorage_benchmark at ale64bit/frostfs-node 2023-03-07 10:47:21 +00:00

4aecd3f79a [#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages

ale64bit opened issue TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#86 2023-03-07 10:45:10 +00:00

Unify testing utils in a single package/place

ale64bit created pull request TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#84 2023-03-07 07:13:39 +00:00

[#81] node: Add basic read/write benchmarks for substorages