There is probably a better place for this documentation but we'd like to move
this elsewhere than a github issue. We can move this to a more appropriate
location with the documentation effort.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
This change adds strong validation for the uuid variable for v2 routes. This is
a minor specification change but is okay since the uuid field is controlled by
the server. The character set is restricted to avoid path traversal, allowing
for alphanumeric values and urlsafe base64 encoding.
This change has no effect on client implementations.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
To allow flexibility in log message context information, this changeset
provides the ability to configure static fields that are included in the
context. Such fields can be set via configuration or environment variables.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
This changeset simply adds hooks into the configuration system to support
multiple different kinds of output formats. These formatters are provided by
logrus and include options such as "text" and "json". The configuraiton
documentation has been updated accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
This enables Azure storage driver to be used with non-default
cloud endpoints like Azure China or Azure Government that does
not use `.blob.core.windows.net` FQDN suffix.
Signed-off-by: Ahmet Alp Balkan <ahmetalpbalkan@gmail.com>
Manifests are now fetched by a field called "reference", which may be a tag or
a digest. When using digests to reference a manifest, the data is immutable.
The routes and specification have been updated to allow this.
There are a few caveats to this approach:
1. It may be problematic to rely on data format to differentiate between a tag
and a digest. Currently, they are disjoint but there may modifications on
either side that break this guarantee.
2. The caching characteristics of returned content are very different for
digest versus tag-based references. Digest urls can be cached forever while tag
urls cannot.
Both of these are minimal caveats that we can live with in the future.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
This changeset adds support for a header to identify docker upload uuids. This
id can be used as a key to manage local state for resumable uploads. The goal
is remove the necessity for a client to parse the url to get an upload uuid.
The restrictions for clients to use the location header are still strongly in
place.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Outlines the format of the tokens and how they are verified.
Outlines how clients should respond to bearer token authorization
challenges.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Josh Hawn <josh.hawn@docker.com> (github: jlhawn)
The goal is to maintain a specification heirarchy under doc/spec. This change
sets the example. The Makefile has also been changed update the AUTHORS file
and can now generate the specification.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Many details have been updated in route descriptors. This commit regenerates
the specification from the latest changes and template.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
This changeset provides data structures and definitions describing the routes
available in the V2 registry API. These route descriptors are structured to
provide automated registration, for creating routers, in addition to complete
documentation duty. It's also a possibility that this could be used to
enumerate test coverage for server implementation.
Using this functionality, we've also developed a template to automatically
generate and API specification for submission into docker core.
As a baseline for the new registry API specification, we are checking in the
proposal as currently covered in docker/docker#9015. This will allow us to
trace the process of transforming the proposal into a specification. The goal
is to use api descriptors to generate templated documentation into SPEC.md. The
resulting product will be submitted into docker core as part of the client PR.
