Evgenii Stratonikov
57efa0bc8e
All checks were successful
DCO action / DCO (pull_request) Successful in 41s
Vulncheck / Vulncheck (pull_request) Successful in 57s
Pre-commit hooks / Pre-commit (pull_request) Successful in 1m42s
Build / Build Components (pull_request) Successful in 1m48s
Tests and linters / gopls check (pull_request) Successful in 2m15s
Tests and linters / Lint (pull_request) Successful in 2m50s
Tests and linters / Staticcheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m2s
Tests and linters / Run gofumpt (pull_request) Successful in 3m4s
Tests and linters / Tests with -race (pull_request) Successful in 3m36s
Tests and linters / Tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m6s
Tests and linters / Run gofumpt (push) Successful in 29s
Vulncheck / Vulncheck (push) Successful in 51s
Pre-commit hooks / Pre-commit (push) Successful in 1m26s
Build / Build Components (push) Successful in 2m14s
Tests and linters / Staticcheck (push) Successful in 2m20s
Tests and linters / Lint (push) Successful in 3m17s
Tests and linters / Tests (push) Successful in 3m47s
OCI image / Build container images (push) Successful in 4m28s
Tests and linters / gopls check (push) Successful in 4m44s
Tests and linters / Tests with -race (push) Successful in 4m49s
Consider `REP 1 REP 1` placement (selects/filters are omitted). The placement is `[1, 2], [1, 0]`. We are the 0-th node. Node 1 is under maintenance, so we do not replicate object on the node 2. In the second replication group node 1 is under maintenance, but current caching logic considers it as "replica holder" and removes local copy. Voilà, we have DL if the object is missing from the node 1. Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| accounting | ||
| apemanager | ||
| common/ape | ||
| container | ||
| control | ||
| netmap | ||
| object | ||
| object_manager | ||
| policer | ||
| replicator | ||
| session | ||
| tree | ||
| util | ||